The book was published in 1987, almost 20 years ago, and it sort of amazed me to page through it. A couple of months ago, see, I attended a panel at Conestoga about "The Year in Television," and the consensus seemed to be that it had been a slow year. Other than Battlestar Galactica and Lost, nothing else had really seemed to take hold and thrive. Even Star Trek, long the most durable and dependable of franchises, no longer had a show in production.
But looking at this book, you realize just how far we've come. The list of the top twenty-five science fiction in shows of all time, voted on by a group of respondents including prominent TV critics, SFWA writers, and SF fan groups, was this:
- Star Trek (and at that time, there was only the one)
- The Twilight Zone (the original)
- The Outer Limits (still only the one)
- The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy (BBC series)
- Dr. Who
- Amazing Stories
- Mork and Mindy
- The Wild, Wild West
- V ("the miniseries," the book qualifies, not the follow-on series)
- The Prisoner
- The Invaders
- Quark
- The Jetsons
- Captain Video
- The Adventures of Superman
- Space Patrol
- Tom Corbett, Space Cadet
- The Twilight Zone (80's revival)
- Lost in Space
- Way Out
- The Avengers
- Battlestar Galactica
- Science Fiction Theater
- My Favorite Martian
- Blake's 7
The point here is that, before Star Trek: The Next Generation ushered in a new wave of serious science fiction shows, the bench was really thin. Some of the shows that are fondly remembered now were not watched because they were good, but because they were the only even vaguely SF-nal thing on at the time. In those days, fans took what they could get. Nowadays, we get more than we can take.
So before you jump on the Aaron Sorkin bandwagon, dercying the degeneration of television into a horrible wasteland compared with some golden past, take another look at the titles on this list, and compare them to what's on today. We have it pretty damn good right about now.
No comments:
Post a Comment